| dc.contributor | Governance Affairs Office | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | United Nations Environment Programme | en_US |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Asia and the Pacific | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-19T13:15:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-19T13:15:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 22/11/2012 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/14173 | |
| dc.description | Major Groups and “The Future We Want”
∗ Pre‐Rio+20: almost two‐thirds of Submissions for the Zero Draft came from the Major Groups
∗ Rio+20: there were more MGS participants than government delegates
∗ “Major Groups and Stakeholders”: only mentioned seven (7) times in the Rio+20 Outcome Document (53 pp, 283 paras.)
∗ “Local communities” – mentioned eight (8) times
∗ “NGOs”: three (3) times
∗ “Trade unions: ‐ five (5) times
∗ Section on “Engaging Major Groups and Other Stakeholders” (paras. 42‐55) under the chapter on Renewing Political Commitments | en_US |
| dc.description.uri | http://www.unep.org/civil-society/Portals/24105/documents/RCMs/2012/ROAP/Session%203%20-%20The%20Role%20of%20Major%20Groups%20in%20the%20Post-Rio20%20Agenda_Neth%20Dano.pdf | en_US |
| dc.language | English | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | Environmental Governance | en_US |
| dc.title | The Role of Major Groups in the Post‐Rio+20 Agenda | en_US |
| dc.type | Presentation | en_US |
| wd.meeting.startdate | 22/11/2012 | |
| wd.meeting.enddate | 23/11/2012 | |
| wd.identifier.collection | Meeting Documents | en_US |
