Show simple item record

Comments on Rule 69 by Major Groups and Stakeholders

dc.contributorGovernance Affairs Officeen_US
dc.contributor.authorUnited Nations Environment Programmeen_US
dc.coverage.spatialGlobalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-23T09:36:52Z
dc.date.available2016-12-23T09:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/13732
dc.descriptionThank you, Madame Chair. I deliver this brief statement on behalf of all Major Groups and Regional Representatives. We had prepared a longer statement with specific text improvement regarding rule 69, on the basis of the proposal presented by the G77 and China. However, it seems that the discussion is not yet that far. Accordingly, we only wish to recall that GC decision 27/2 calls for strengthening the current framework for stakeholder engagement, in order to improve the new UNEP and enhance its role as the leading environmental authority. In this regard, the RoP should reflect best practices at UNEP and the High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. At the same time, the RoP should also enable continuous improvement and guarantee against non-regression.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.unep.org/civil-society/Portals/24105/documents/meetings/oecpr2014/Statement%20on%20Rules%20of%20Procedure.pdfen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Governanceen_US
dc.titleComments on Rule 69 by Major Groups and Stakeholdersen_US
dc.typeStatement/Declarationen_US
wd.meeting.nameUNEP Open-Ended CPR 2014en_US
wd.meeting.startdate2014-03-24
wd.meeting.enddate2014-03-28
wd.identifier.collectionMeeting Documentsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record