| dc.contributor | DTIE | |
| dc.contributor.author | United Nations Environment Programme | |
| dc.contributor.author | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Argentina | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Brazil | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | North America | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Spain | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Italy | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Asia | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Japan | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Morocco | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Kenya; | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-11T20:03:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-10-11T20:03:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9251046336 | |
| dc.identifier.other | MBR 10 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/8220 | |
| dc.description | Methyl bromide (MeBr), used as a fumigant to control several soil-borne pests in various crops, is a strong ozone depleter, and governments and international agencies aware of the problem have agreed to establish a programme to phase out its use. As a result, some literature on new MeBr alternatives is available that describes the feasibility and disadvantages of each new pest control measure. Some of these publications result from workshops and symposia organized in different countries by the United Nations Environment Programme and by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The present report provides information on successful alternatives in some countries or regions where MeBr is being phased out. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.publisher | UNEP | |
| dc.publisher | FAO | |
| dc.relation | 421 | |
| dc.rights | Public | en_US |
| dc.title | Global report on validated alternatives to the use of methyl bromide for soil fumigation | |
| dc.type | Reports, Books and Booklets | en_US |
| wd.identifier.old-id | 373 | |
| wd.identifier.sdg | SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being | |
| wd.identifier.sdgio | http://purl.unep.org/sdg/SDGIO_00000037 | |
