Elements of a New Climate Agreement by 2015 - Perspective Series 2013
Date
2013Author
United Nations Environment Programme
Citation Tool
Bibliographic Managers
RT Generic T1 Elements of a New Climate Agreement by 2015 - Perspective Series 2013 A1 United Nations Environment Programme YR 2013 LK https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/32247 PB AB TY - GEN T1 - Elements of a New Climate Agreement by 2015 - Perspective Series 2013 AU - United Nations Environment Programme Y1 - 2013 UR - https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/32247 PB - AB - @misc{20.500.11822_32247 author = {United Nations Environment Programme}, title = {Elements of a New Climate Agreement by 2015 - Perspective Series 2013}, year = {2013}, abstract = {}, url = {https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/32247} } @misc{20.500.11822_32247 author = {United Nations Environment Programme}, title = {Elements of a New Climate Agreement by 2015 - Perspective Series 2013}, year = {2013}, abstract = {}, url = {https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/32247} } TY - GEN T1 - Elements of a New Climate Agreement by 2015 - Perspective Series 2013 AU - United Nations Environment Programme UR - https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/32247 PB - AB -View/Open
Item Statistics
Display item statisticsMetadata
Show full item recordDescription
This chapter describes the gap between expected emissions in 2020 according to country pledges and the emissions consistent with the 2°C target, assuming the emission reduction proposals in the Copenhagen Accord and Cancún Agreements are met. It is based on the UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2012 updated with decisions taken late 2012. The estimated emissions gap in 2020 for a “likely” chance of being on track to stay below the 2°C target is 8 to 12 GtCO2e (depending on how emission reduction pledges are implemented). This emissions gap has become larger compared to the previous UNEP assessment, because of higher than expected economic growth and the inclusion of “double counting” of emission offsets in the calculations. The emissions gap could be narrowed through implementing
the more stringent, conditional pledges, minimising the use of “lenient” credits from forests and surplus emission units, avoiding double-counting of offsets and implementing measures beyond current pledges. Closing the gap will increasingly become more difficult with more time passing.
Collections
Document Viewer
To read more, scroll down below.