Show simple item record

dc.contributorEcosystems Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.authorUnited Nations Environment Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaribbean Environment Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.otherGray, Erinen_US
dc.contributor.otherBurke, Laurettaen_US
dc.contributor.otherLambert, L. Jasmineen_US
dc.contributor.otherAltamirano, Juan Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.otherMehrhof, Whitneyen_US
dc.coverage.spatialLatin America and the Caribbeanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T05:48:26Z
dc.date.available2022-07-01T05:48:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/40293
dc.descriptionOur recommended approach to economic valuation to influence decision-makers on investment in wastewater treatment follows the three-phased approach recommended by Waite et al., 2014 in Coastal Capital: Economic Valuation for Decision-making in the Caribbean – (1) Scoping; (2) Analysis; and (3) Outreach and communications (see Figure 1). This section of the report (Part II: Economic Valuation Methodology Guidance) is intended to lead valuation practitioners through the scoping and analysis phases.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.unep.org/cep/en_US
dc.formatTexten_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.rightsPublicen_US
dc.subjectWASTEWATERen_US
dc.subjectWASTE MANAGEMENTen_US
dc.subjectCARIBBEAN REGIONen_US
dc.subjectVALUATIONen_US
dc.titleValuing the Costs and Benefits of Improved Wastewater Management: Part II: Economic Valuation Methodology Guidance - CEP Technical Report 93en_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitationen_US
wd.topicsChemicals and Pollution Actionen_US
wd.identifier.pagesnumber37 pagesen_US
wd.identifier.institutionsRegional Seas - Cartagena Conventionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record